Sunday, December 25, 2011
the middle of the night- can’t get good sleep (once or twice a month).
Heart palpitations (occasionally at night, not often)
Chest pain (not often, but when I have them, they are usually associated with stress)
Had to sometimes wake up in the middle of the
night to put dog out.
Leg cramps (went months without them and then would get a bout)
Periodic easy bruising (very irregular. sometimes when getting ready to take a shower would see 3 or 4 bruises on my leg and butt)
Hair loss at the end of summer 2010 (lost a lot of hair- could barely do a ponytail with some wisps of hair)
The above are no longer a problem. I am no longer anemic (forgot to mention that as a problem), which i mainly credit to aleve. I make it easier to cool down in the middle of the night by using a fan or, like now that it's colder in my house cuz odf winter, i just have two blankets (that i throw off in stages as i begin to heat up) and easy to peel off pjs so i can cool down so fast that i can get right back to sleep. my chest pain from stress is not an issue now cause as soon as i feel a twinge, i consciously relax my body and change my mindset. if i feel a leg cramp, which i rarely or even never do now, i stretch my foot into an "L" shape instead of pointing my toes and that keeps me from getting a cramp. i am regularly drinking a cup of homemade bone soup at least 4 times a week. i have recently started to take a mutivitamin after i started to get sore gums and thought i might have a vitamin/mineral deficiency. i am currently on 50,000 IU of D2 a week to correct a 28 (forgot unit) vitamin d deficient state. I also was on antibiotics in november for a bad cough and a separate course for a urinary tract infection. i try to remember to take my cod liver oil (recent addition to up my vita a on dr. kruse's advice since i am upping my vitamin d steeply) and vita k-2 mk4 to improve my gum/jaw bone health.
my main current problem in lots of gum recession, especially behind the bottom front teeth. i'm hoping the vitamin a, d, and k2 mk4 will help with this situation. i must remember to be grateful for the problems that have gone away while i deal with current ones. merry x mas :)
Friday, February 4, 2011
Chris Masterjohn writes:
"Taleb says he eats "no carbs that do not have a Biblical Hebrew or Doric Greek name (i.e., did not exist in the ancient Mediterranean)." I think that's his own rule, not De Vany's. He seems to primarily credit De Vany with his exercise routine."
Taleb writes as the las 2 sentences in his afterword to Professor De Vany's book: "So good luck with the regimen. I've been on it for close to 3 years and my intellectual production keeps getting greater."
I think we can assume that by the word "regimen" used in the afterword in a book with the word "Diet" in it, that Taleb is including the concept of *diet* in his endorsement of the book. In other words, he is a believer in the De Vany guidelines for *diet*. His diet mentioned in the afterword follows those guidelines. He is close to my age and was overweight. He has had ongoing success with the diet. He is very smart. Therefore his endorsement of De Vany means more to me than a criticism of the De Vany guidelines coming from someone much younger than me who never had metabolic issues. Dr. Harris is close to my age, but has never been never fat. De Vany has never been fat either, but his guidelines work for the most metabolically challenged and have the longest record of success that I know about.
I do think that Professor De Vany has cleared up some contentious points, but he only does that on his blog, so if you are not a subscriber, you are missing out. It's like $40 a year- not a lot for even a cheapskate like me who used to get around paying the fee by coming into the blog via a google search before he closed that loophole.
I remember in response to one poster who wrote that he ate a lot of eggs with the yolks everyday from his own hens, Professor De Vany wrote that (paraphrasing here) the poster's activity level probably mitigated all the fat he was taking in, but that most people who eat lots of eggs with the yolks are getting a surge of fat to their system. Then they get in their cars to go to office jobs where they just sit around. So in that context, which prevails for many people (all the people not employed in physically demanding jobs), eating lots of yolks is problematic. He explained more of the science, but I need to find that info and quote him directly since i am science-challenged :(
Chris Masterjohn wrote: "Usually when people explain a psychological trait as something that "began in evolutionary times" with an adaptive function, they are suggesting it is a heritable adaptation. If that is not what De Vany meant, and he personally corrects me, or someone can convince me from something he has written that this is not what he meant, I will gladly change it."
De Vany does not use any words on page 179 indicating that the attitude towards fat people is heritable. I would never have that interpretation because, as far as I know, *no one* makes the claims that attitudes are biological heritable. Where did you hear that concept? Could you site some references? Ideas/attitudes/culture are passed down through time, yes, but this is not a function of heritability. Just because he used the phrase "...began during evolutionary times..." you went off on that tangent? I just took that phrase to me in the early period of the evolution of homo sapiens.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Chris Masterjohn said: "My point was not where he is placing blame, but that he was offering "just so" stories reducing cultural beliefs to *heritable* evolutionary adaptations with no evidence other than creative stories." I must be lacking sensitivity to language, so be patient with me, but where does Professor De Vany say that the propensity to judge obese people harshly was a heritable adaptation? Your
Also you missed my point about age completely. It is because our bodies don't generally run as well when we are older (say 40s on) compared to when we are younger. That is why an older person who does well on a diet with all the metabolic issues they have to struggle through has more credibility than a 20 something with a less metabolically challenged body. Now if you show me a 20 something who was very obese and diabetic who did well on the diet you recommend, that would also carry a lot of weight. Was my point really that hard to understand? Did you really think I was saying I listen to my elders just because they are elderly? Where is the rolling eyes emoticon???